Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:39:26
Message-Id: 20120308173722.4b9fa7eb@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:30:47 +0100
2 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:14:58 +0000
4 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > > Having a different, special rule for something that looks exactly
6 > > like lots of other things that do not have that different, special
7 > > rule is hardly hair splitting. This rule would have to be
8 > > documented and have special code to carefully enforce it. That's a
9 > > big deal.
10 >
11 > Exactly like HOMEPAGE is a big deal?
12 >
13 > HOMEPAGE Package's homepage. If you are unable to locate an
14 > official one, try to provide a link to freshmeat.net or a similar
15 > package tracking site. Never refer to a variable name in the string;
16 > include only raw text.
17 >
18 > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html
19
20 That's a QA thing, not a spec thing, and it's there because some
21 old-school developers don't know how to use their package manager
22 properly, and want to copy-paste a string from an ebuild into their
23 browser.
24
25 It's a silly rule. And if you take a count of how many ebuilds and
26 eclasses break that rule, you'll see exactly why such rules are a
27 problem.
28
29 --
30 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature