Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: waltdnes@××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:03:44
Message-Id: 20111012090517.2e8446be@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev by Walter Dnes
1 On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:40:23 -0400
2 "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 > The other option is to drop udev entirely. As an example, I suggest
5 > looking at Alpine Linux http://alpinelinux.org/ It's a lightweight
6 > server-oriented distro. It uses busybox's mdev instead of udev, and
7 > some other mdev substitutes in place of standard packages. It uses
8 > openrc. Furthermore, "previous versions of Alpine were based on
9 > Gentoo" as per
10 > http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package so there
11 > should be no problem with us borrowing back from Alpine.
12
13 Goodbye desktop users then.
14
15 We recently dropped HAL. Now all the magic that was done by HAL (and
16 required udev anyway) is done through udev directly. Dropping udev =
17 dropping it all. This means that no *kit would work anymore, xorg will
18 require explicit configuration, bluez may not work anymore as well.
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>