| 1 |
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for |
| 5 |
>>> use in other contexts without permission of the author. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If the entire package is installed (ie, it's not broken up into |
| 11 |
> separate libraries or sub-packages) this would be fine (ie having the |
| 12 |
> package in portage), wouldn't it? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I guess the primary restriction here would be that nothing else would |
| 15 |
> be allowed to link against any embedded libraries; ie, the package |
| 16 |
> couldn't be a dep. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It simply creates one binary which I am interested in. I don't see any |
| 20 |
problem if I use fetch restriction. The only remaining question would be |
| 21 |
the actual LICENSE? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
justin |
Archives