Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Hi!
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > eval `grep '^EAPI=' ebuildfile | head -n 1`
> >
> > will set EAPI in the current scope to EAPI in the ebuild, without
> > sourcing it, unless the issue with something like this would be its
> > use of grep and head, but these are both in the system set, so unless
> > you don't want to depend on the system set, I don't know what the
> > objection would be.
>
> The objection is that your code doesn't work. It's entirely legal to
> do, say:
>
> export EAPI="1"
Change the spec, then. Or aren't we talking about
writing/changing/clarifying a spec right now? I mean... yes,
ebuilds are actually bash scripts. But I don't see a problem with
using a subset of what's allowed for *this* *specific* line.
Actually, I personally would prefer taking it out of the
parsed-by-bash part entirely. Add it as a shebang-like line at
the top:
#EAPI-1
as the first or second line. Allowing it on the second line
allows you to later bolt on a true shebang-line if you should so
desire. Only having to look at the first two lines makes finding
it out easier (note that I don't call that parsing on purpose).
> or:
>
> inherit versionator
>
> if version_is_at_least 2 ; then
> EAPI="2"
> else
> EAPI="0"
> fi
I was under the impression that it's illegal to change/set the
EAPI after using inherit.
Regards,
Tobias
--
Found on a small utility knife in MIT's lab supply:
"Caution. Blade is sharp. Keep out of children."
|
|