Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: pr@g.o, devrel@g.o, antarus@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:37:30
Message-Id: t2rb41005391003241037o219c4a12ld3466e6c1e275ae1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item by Ben de Groot
1 On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 24 March 2010 18:23, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
3 > <Arfrever@g.o> wrote:
4 >> 2010-03-24 17:56:48 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
5 >>> On 24 March 2010 17:43, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
6 >>> <Arfrever@g.o> wrote:
7 >>> > 2010-03-23 20:28:38 Ben de Groot napisał(a):
8 >>> >> On 23 March 2010 20:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
9 >>> >> <Arfrever@g.o> wrote:
10 >>> >> > I'm attaching updated news item, which will be committed soon.
11 >>> >>
12 >>> >> As mentioned in the other thread, this news item should mention
13 >>> >> that users who do not need python-3 should mask it locally to
14 >>> >> prevent it from being pulled into the dependency graph.
15 >>> >
16 >>> > Python maintainers do not recommend to mask Python 3.
17 >>>
18 >>> Are you saying that you are just going to brush aside all
19 >>> concerns that have been voiced about this issue? You will
20 >>> upset a lot of people if you do that.
21 >>
22 >> All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have been
23 >> addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations.
24 >
25 > I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns
26 > and recommendations of your fellow Gentoo developers.
27
28 Except he is under no obligation to follow said recommendations; he is
29 the Python maintainer, not you.
30
31 -A
32
33 >
34 > CC'ing devrel because this is getting out of hand.
35 > --
36 > Ben de Groot
37 > Gentoo Linux Qt project lead developer
38 >
39 >