Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:46
Message-Id: 200908211625.42832.Arfrever@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' by Ryan Hill
1 2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
2 > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100
3 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
6 > > Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
7 > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already
8 > > > handles it right).
9 > >
10 > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose
11 > > it for EAPI 4 if you want that.
12 >
13 > Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)? Portage has supported this
14 > for quite a while now. Does the current PMS disallow it?
15
16 Portage documentation has been properly fixed (and the fix will be released
17 in next version) and this feature can now be used in 10.0 profiles.
18
19 --
20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>