| 1 |
Excerpts from Dale's message of 2011-11-14 13:43:36 +0100: |
| 2 |
> Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Excerpts from Dale's message of 2011-11-14 13:17:28 +0100: |
| 4 |
> > > Here is some feedback then. I liked it the way it was. When a |
| 5 |
> > > build fails, I do a one of install of that package and I like to |
| 6 |
> > > see the output. Why, because sometimes it gives me a hint as to |
| 7 |
> > > why it failed or something I can google for. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > If it fails you get tail of build.log, so you see it anyway. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That doesn't always go back far enough tho. I have on my new rig seen |
| 12 |
> the failure be as far back as a couple hundred lines. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, don't say that if problem is hundreds lines back you search it in |
| 15 |
that output. I'd use for that purpose "less build.log" anyway. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
Archives