Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:58:52
Message-Id: 1158929715.10027.2.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers by Peter
1 On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 12:29 +0000, Peter wrote:
2
3
4 > We can disagree on that point. All distros are businesses. Users are
5 > customers. No users, no distro.
6
7 That is not strictly true. You can have a distro without users --
8 nobody but you would be using it -- it's still a distro. It all depends
9 on what you expect out of the project. I think Sejo's got the right
10 idea this time -- this distro is just a community, and that's how it's
11 run (well, it's run more like a commune, but anyway). If it were run
12 like a business, the behaviour would be a lot different (and a lot more
13 closed). For starters, there would actually be a leadership situation
14 in place. You can argue that Gentoo *began* its life as a business, but
15 the past three years have been far removed from that paradigm.
16
17
18 Thanks,
19 --
20 Seemant Kulleen
21 Developer, Gentoo Linux
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers Peter <sw98234@×××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>