Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 12:29 +0000, Peter wrote:
> We can disagree on that point. All distros are businesses. Users are
> customers. No users, no distro.
That is not strictly true. You can have a distro without users --
nobody but you would be using it -- it's still a distro. It all depends
on what you expect out of the project. I think Sejo's got the right
idea this time -- this distro is just a community, and that's how it's
run (well, it's run more like a commune, but anyway). If it were run
like a business, the behaviour would be a lot different (and a lot more
closed). For starters, there would actually be a leadership situation
in place. You can argue that Gentoo *began* its life as a business, but
the past three years have been far removed from that paradigm.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
| Replies: |
Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Josh Saddler
|
Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Peter
|
| References: |
seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Grant Goodyear
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Simon Stelling
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Ciaran McCreesh
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Simon Stelling
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Mike Pagano
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Peter
|
Delay in approval of new developers
-- Andrew Ross
|
Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Peter
|
Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Jochen Maes
|
Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Peter
|
Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Jochen Maes
|
Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Peter
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
| Next by date: |
| Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
|