List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 20:02 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800
> Zac Medico <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> > > Pacho Ramos <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> > >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> > >> stabilization)?
> > >>
> > >> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
> > >> testing purposes :-/
> > >
> > > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes
> > > people's systems unbootable.
> > >
> > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions.
> > Stabilize grub-1.99, and modify the grub-0.9x ebuilds to die if they
> > can't find a supported compiler.
> What's the state of 1.99? I know someone was working on it recently. We'd
> also have to update the handbooks. I think it could be several months of
> work to get it ready, and I'd like to unmask 4.6 last September.
As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is
causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for
stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do that sooner or
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)