| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
| 6 |
>> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
| 7 |
>> stabilization)? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
| 10 |
>> testing purposes :-/ |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes |
| 13 |
> people's systems unbootable. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Is it a bad idea to go ahead and unmask it on architectures that don't use grub? |
Archives