Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: USE=qa-test
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:33:22 +0200
Hi! 

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
> [... separate testing flag/feature for
> complicated/long/somehwat broken test suites ...]
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/287722

I agree. However, some of the cases aren't quite clear-cut. Take,
for example fftw. Its test suite takes about half an hour on a
modern machine (or so the ebuild claims). That's still several
times the normal build time. And in the case of slower arches,
the time can skyrocket: even on our quad-cpu Alpha dev machine
(definitely on the beefy end), the test suite takes over three
hours. 

Bottom line: at least for the build time, some sort of guideline
("increases buildtime by more than a factor of X or more than Y
minutes") might be useful. The same goes for ballooning
installed-package size. 

I think the "breaks a lot" is more clear cut, and "causes
security problems" definitely is.

Regards,
Tobias



-- 
We are sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary.
Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.


References:
RFC: USE=qa-test
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
RFC: USE=qa-test
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: USE=qa-test
Previous by date:
RFC: USE=qa-test
Next by date:
Re: RFC: USE=qa-test


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.