Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:54:47
Message-Id: 20090528005440.1663441e@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Thu, 28 May 2009 01:48:34 +0200
2 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:18 +0100
4 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 +0000 (UTC)
6 > > Mark Bateman <couldbe@××××.com> wrote:
7 > > > NOT once within GLEP55 [...]
8 >
9 > > Not once has there been an equally good alternative proposed.
10 >
11 > None needed, seems to be the major voice.
12
13 So it's your opinion that Gentoo should go with an in every way inferior
14 solution that doesn't solve the problem as well?
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>