| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 06:19:17 -0700 |
| 3 |
Alain Penders <alain@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > I'm forced to proofread the new builds completely as to avoid |
| 6 |
> > getting messed over. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Maybe because they trust that all our developers know how to diff a |
| 9 |
> submitted ebuild against the last approved one? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
What do you think I mean with proofread, really? |
| 12 |
(vimdiff and gtkdiff are both quite handy on larger stuff , gdm comes to |
| 13 |
mind as more or less a nightmareish example) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Even with a changelog entry, I would never add a user-submitted ebuild |
| 17 |
> without diffing it and making sure I know what changed and why. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
of course not, I'm not inclined to have my or others systems compromised |
| 20 |
or messed over, But my point is: adding a ChangeLog or stating what is |
| 21 |
done difference does make a change when submitting a build for something |
| 22 |
thats already in the tree. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
//Spider |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
begin .signature |
| 29 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 30 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 31 |
end |
Archives