Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Ross <aross@×××××××××××.au>
To: Benjamin Coles <sj7trunks@g.o>
Cc: Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?)
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:09:24
Message-Id: 1080515359.6157.37.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) by Benjamin Coles
1 On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 07:02, Benjamin Coles wrote:
2 > Much apologies on the ebuilds, I must admit that these are my favorite
3 > packages to maintain (qmail-ldap). It is quite hard to get some stuff
4 > done with the ebuilds even when it consists of minor changes. I noticed
5 > that you were in need of help on the ebuilds. I am available online as
6 > sj7trunks and you may message me since I am very interested in helping
7 > people get Gentoo into the mainstream. I recently lost my job so I've
8 > added this to my list of to do and I'm also working on an LDAP book for
9 > Prentice Hall so I'm fairly confident I'll be able to help you out.
10
11 Thanks, Ben and congratulations on your book deal!
12
13 I actually succeeded in migrating our central server (router, firewall,
14 mail, www, squid, etc) to Gentoo in early Jan and was able to beat
15 qmail-ldap into shape (using the in-portage ebuilds and the patches I
16 supplied via Bugzilla).
17
18 I was fortunate enough to be given a reasonable degree of freedom in OS
19 choice, which, I believe, is the only reason we were able to make the
20 switch to Gentoo. I strongly suspect that, had management known the
21 difficulties related to the qmail-ldap ebuilds, they would have forced
22 my hand (probably to another Linux distro, eg. Debian or Fedora).
23
24 As stated previously, I've sinced moved from sysadmin to webmaster. Even
25 though I'm no longer responsible for our central server (save website
26 related ebuilds eg apache and php), I dearly love Gentoo (running it on
27 my desktop and home server) and want to see it move forward as a
28 distribution, esp in the corporate sector (I await 2004.1 and security
29 only updates with glee!)
30
31 I'd very much like to see qmail-ldap reach the same level of stability
32 (ebuild-wise) as mainstream qmail, and am keen to assist where-ever
33 possible.
34
35 Unless you're already working on it, I'll have a play with the various
36 reported bugs and their associated patches, in addition to the latest
37 qmail and qmail-ldap ebuilds - seeing if I can add the conf-*
38 functionality suggested by robbat2
39
40 Cheers
41
42 Andrew
43
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list