1 |
El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió: |
2 |
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> > Hello |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their |
7 |
> > maintainer: |
8 |
> > $ grep -r wormo */*/metada* |
9 |
> > app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> |
10 |
> > app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> |
11 |
> > www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she |
15 |
> > retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages |
16 |
> > be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)? |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about |
19 |
> > some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some |
24 |
> packages" and |
25 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/custom_userhistory.cgi?matchstr=wormo@g.o |
26 |
> shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her |
27 |
> via direct email? :) Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager |
28 |
> that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and |
29 |
> willing to fix what you break. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -Jeremy |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
OK, sorry for the inconvenience (also to jlec, that has also replied to |
36 |
this), I misinterpreted wormo retirement bug report |
37 |
|
38 |
Thanks for your help |