Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:24:54 +0200
On 06/15/2012 09:44 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Every Xfce ebuild in gentoo-x86 is using pkg_setup() for 3 variables,
> DOCS for src_install, PATCHES for src_prepare, and XFCONF for src_configure
> 
> No way we will add all 3 phases to every Xfce ebuild since that would
> defeat the purpose of the xfconf.eclass which is designed so that we
> cope with 99,0% using just pkg_setup()

defining a function and call it from the eclass would be impossible?

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero



Replies:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Michał Górny
References:
ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Samuli Suominen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Next by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Previous by date:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by date:
Re: Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.