Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:43:53
Message-Id: 20101121014757.405f1de1@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow by Alistair Bush
1 On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
2 Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > > We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
5 > >
6 > > Why not?
7 >
8 > Yeah why not? do you inform users of this?
9
10 Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention to
11 what's going on behind the scenes. They're in the tree for people who
12 know what they're doing to test. Even unmasked, toolchain revbumps are
13 expensive and we do them only when absolutely necessary.
14
15
16 --
17 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
18 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
19 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow Alex Alexander <wired@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>