Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Subject: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:47:57 -0600
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> wrote:

> > > We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
> > 
> > Why not?
> 
> Yeah why not?  do you inform users of this?

Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention to
what's going on behind the scenes.  They're in the tree for people who
know what they're doing to test.  Even unmasked, toolchain revbumps are
expensive and we do them only when absolutely necessary.


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Michał Górny
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Peter Volkov
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Alex Alexander
References:
GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Ryan Hill
Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Ryan Hill
Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Nikos Chantziaras
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
-- Alistair Bush
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
Next by thread:
Re: Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow
Previous by date:
IUSE="minimal" seems like a bad idea
Next by date:
Re: IUSE="minimal" seems like a bad idea


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.