From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow | ||
Date: | Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:43:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 20101121014757.405f1de1@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow by Alistair Bush |
1 | On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300 |
2 | Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > > > We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages. |
5 | > > |
6 | > > Why not? |
7 | > |
8 | > Yeah why not? do you inform users of this? |
9 | |
10 | Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention to |
11 | what's going on behind the scenes. They're in the tree for people who |
12 | know what they're doing to test. Even unmasked, toolchain revbumps are |
13 | expensive and we do them only when absolutely necessary. |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
18 | toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
19 | @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow | Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow | Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> |