On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Samuli Suominen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Merely saying if we had some documentation snippet, or an end-quiz
> question for this, QA could more easily/faster revoke access if someone
> were to do this intentionally in tree. This could be minor motivation
> for me to write such snippet, but it's definately not near top on my TODO.
I think that something that is worth an official policy is whether in
fact "<" or "=" dependencies are acceptable, or in general when they
are acceptable. That isn't to say that we have to enumerate all
possibilities, but there should be guidelines.
I don't think there really is a clear consensus on this. It is
definitely a can of worms and I don't think black-and-white is the
right approach to take. While slotting libraries is often an option,
that gets a lot messier when you're talking about things like header