1 |
On 11/14/2010 05:41 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote: |
2 |
> On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
>> Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: |
4 |
>>> I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of |
5 |
>>> fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Oh the heck are they implemented? If they are FatELF, no they shouldn't |
8 |
>> be used, ever, full stop. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> They don't tell. From the manual: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Fat binary, ‘--enable-fat’ |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Using ‘--enable-fat’ selects a “fat binary” build on x86 or x86 64 |
15 |
> systems, where optimized low level subroutines are chosen at runtime |
16 |
> according to the CPU de- tected. This means more code, but gives |
17 |
> reasonable performance from a single bi- nary for all x86 chips, or |
18 |
> similarly for all x86 64 chips. (This option might become available for |
19 |
> more architectures in the future.) |
20 |
|
21 |
This is useless for Gentoo Users, IMO. Besides, the people that *want* |
22 |
this (anyone?) can use 'EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-fat" emerge sci-libs/mpir' |
23 |
|
24 |
-Jeremy |