Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-db/libiodbc: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:37:28
Message-Id: 1329766581.21166.8.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-db/libiodbc: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog by Samuli Suominen
1 El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
2 > On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
3 > > scarabeus 12/02/20 15:57:31
4 > >
5 > > Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
6 > > Log:
7 > > Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt bug#405029.
8 > >
9 > > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64)
10 > >
11 > > Revision Changes Path
12 > > 1.2 dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
13 > >
14 > > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup
15 > > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
16 > > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
17 > >
18 > > Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
19 > > ===================================================================
20 > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v
21 > > retrieving revision 1.1
22 > > retrieving revision 1.2
23 > > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
24 > > --- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000 1.1
25 > > +++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000 1.2
26 > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
27 > > # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
28 > > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
29 > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $
30 > > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $
31 > >
32 > > EAPI=4
33 > >
34 > > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
35 > >
36 > > DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README"
37 > >
38 > > +MAKEOPTS="-j1"
39 > > +
40 >
41 > Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get
42 > respected?
43 >
44 >
45 About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use "MAKEOPTS
46 +=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild) instead or it should
47 be avoided for some reason.
48
49 Thanks for the info :)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies