1 |
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 |
2 |
Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello! |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: |
9 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their |
12 |
> > maintainers in Gentoo. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday |
16 |
> > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, |
17 |
> > 10 days from now. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > What do you think? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Sebastian |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently |
27 |
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the |
28 |
> status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> --Nathan Zachary |
31 |
|
32 |
The ones that I'm CCed on, either as proxy maintainer or because I have some other interest, I prolly would mind. They're not simple revbumps, but they have dependency changes and/or other complicated changes, which is the only reason why they're still open. My bugs can't be solved with a simple rename-and-commit. |
33 |
|
34 |
I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick your bugs carefully! Otherwise we'll end up with another screwed-up mess like the one we just went through with patrick. |
35 |
|
36 |
Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. |