| 1 |
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 19:58 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le 01/02/2009 18:32, Norberto Bensa a écrit : |
| 3 |
> > Excuse me for thread hijack. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Would it make sense to add (for example): |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > gnome-games |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> gnome-games is already the name of a package that contains all official |
| 10 |
> GNOME games. Only a handful are also released and packaged separately. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Useless for us IMHO. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That said, I'm still threatening to split gnome-games up to individual |
| 15 |
packages one rainy day. But if that goes through (time-wise and has team |
| 16 |
agreement), the individual games would be in the suitable games-* |
| 17 |
category (games-arcade, games-board, etc) with a gnome-extra/gnome-games |
| 18 |
still in place (one day gnome-base/) - newer versions being meta |
| 19 |
packages pulling in the individual official games. |
| 20 |
And not in a gnome-games/ category. Then you can find gnome-games meta |
| 21 |
package from gnome-*/ category and individual games in their suitable |
| 22 |
category (glchess is a cool board game, etc).. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Mart Raudsepp |
| 27 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 28 |
Mail: leio@g.o |
| 29 |
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio |
Archives