1 |
Abhishek Amit [abhishekamit2000@×××××.com] wrote: |
2 |
> I don't even think this is really important, as cvs ebuilds are meant to |
3 |
> be sued sparingly(only when the release version is really old, as gaim |
4 |
> was and I'm sure there are some other critereia that can be used). |
5 |
> gaim-cvs is depreacted now. Perhaps it is just me, but I really don't |
6 |
> see the point in adding mroe features to prtage for three or four |
7 |
> packages. |
8 |
|
9 |
I would disagree with this. I have quite a few ebuilds that are in |
10 |
my local portage tree purely so I can run the cvs version of a few |
11 |
appliations and still manage it with portage. It would definately |
12 |
be nice if there was a clean way to handle it within the portage |
13 |
system itself. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |