1 |
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> I have a package that depends on python-dateutil:python-2 for |
4 |
>> python2_x and python-dateutil:python-3 for python3_x. |
5 |
>> Would it be possible to have virtual targets like "python, python2, |
6 |
>> python3, pypi, jithon" ? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> With regards to python-dateutil: As of python-dateutil-2.1, there are |
10 |
> no longer separate slots for python-2 and python-3. As well, I masked |
11 |
> the only version (2.0) with SLOT=python-3. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> For future compatibility, you should remove the slot from your |
14 |
> dependencies and just depend on dev-python/python-dateutil. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Yep, I just saw that. But well, celery is full of examples like thats |
18 |
since it have different dependencies for python2, python2.5, python2.5 |
19 |
+ tests, jython, jython + tests, etc.. |
20 |
Having a way to group similar python would be great. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Corentin Chary |
25 |
http://xf.iksaif.net |