Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
Subject: Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:56:00 +0100
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> said:
> On 19:06 Wed 11 Mar     , Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be
> > > > available via IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a
> > > > project could realize more of its potential by better integrating
> > > > people who dont do IRC.
>
> I think IRC helps to build a more tightly knit community and, because
> of this, is very important to Gentoo. The less close we are as a
> community, the more free we feel to be hostile because we don't see the
> folks on the other end of the big tube as real people. It's much like a
> technique that militaries use during wars to de-personalize the enemy,
> except with the Internet, we start that way and have to apply effort to
> grow closer.

so you say, that presumption is ok? i agree 100% with what you say, but it 
doesnt (at least directly) address my concern. i think IRC is an excellent 
medium - the problems i see, though, are related to the fact that IRC 
requires all stakeholders to be available at the time of discussion. for a 
multitude of reasons this can almost never be guaranteed. also, even if we 
did have IRC logs, the signal to noise ratio on IRC is devastating (at 
least in my experience).

for those reasons, i would like to see more bridge-building between the 
worlds. i didnt want to give examples, as i dont like pointing fingers, 
but here it is: relengs discussion to switch to weekly autobuilds. 
presumably there hast been one, but i cant find it in the list archives. 
not on gentoo-dev@g.o and not on gentoo-releng@g.o - where else should i 
look? IRC perhaps - well, where are the logs? interestingly, the 
announcement of the switch has a pointer to the releng project page, which 
does not even mention the IRC channel.

from looking at the releng mailing list one gets the impression that 
releng in gentoo is dead. its not - i know and am greatful for the hard 
work everybody in releng puts in - but it makes the releng project much 
less accessible. to follow, or contribute.

thanks for listening
kind regards
Thilo

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Donnie Berkholz
References:
Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )
-- Caleb Cushing
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Thilo Bangert
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Next by thread:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Previous by date:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Next by date:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.