Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:05:48 +0100
On 07-11-2009 17:54:25 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > Sounds like we could benefit from the "noarch" approach known in the RPM
> > > world, such that all these packages can also be immediately keyworded
> > > and stabilised for all arches.  Would greatly simplify things for a
> > > great deal of packages, maybe?
> > 
> > We could introduce "noarch" and "~noarch" KEYWORDS, add "noarch" to
> > the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct
> > unstable users to add "~noarch" to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
> 
> Looks like this will not work for all noarch packages. Stardict
> dictionary itself is noarch, but it RDEPENDS on stardict package which
> is keyworded only on some archs. So we'll be forced either to keyword
> stardict on all archs or we need to introduce some new way to work with
> such situations.

Would it be reasonable to just mask in such case?  Resolution would
eventually just hit the masked stardict dictionary and display the
reason why it's masked (stardict doesn't compile, not yet looked into
keywording: please try, etc.)


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level


References:
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Petteri R├Ąty
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: Re: QA: package.mask policies
Next by date:
Re: a pragmatic approach to FEATURES [was FEATURES use or misuse?]


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.