Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:06:54AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> autofs-4.0.0_pre9.ebuild should work. Maybe Daniel can document the naming
> pattern somewhere on the net.
There's some (old but mostly correct) documentation at the beginning of
/usr/lib/python/portage.py that covers how the version numbers work.
> > iptables: v1.2: can't initialize iptables table 'nat': iptables who? (do
> > you need to insmod?)
> > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded
>
> I think that is just a kernel-configuration issue.
It could be because you need to use the iptables-1.2 kernel patch-o-matic to
get ipv6 nat to work -- included with the iptables sources. Rusty says that
most of these patches are in some way *buggy*, so be careful. I'm happily
using ipv4 nat without any patches.
--
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.
|
| Replies: |
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- Bill Anderson
|
| References: |
ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- Justin Vander Ziel
|
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- Achim Gottinger
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers |
| Next by date: |
| boot pretty |
|