Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:02:48 +0200
On 01/02/2011 05:19 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:

> 
> 
> One way we could drop EAPI 0 would be if we do a major review of tree
> and repo formats to improve upgrade paths, which would however likely
> require breaking backwards compatibility at such point.
> I believe such a change would only be acceptable, if we would pack
> enough features and safety measures that it would ensure another break
> would not need to be done for a long time.
> 

It's quite likely that if you are currently on a system with Portage
that does not understand EAPI 1 there's so many obstacles along the
upgrade path that a clean install makes more sense. Maybe someone is
willing to test this so that we actually know if there is an upgrade
path from EAPI 0 available any more.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
-- Jeroen Roovers
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
-- Roy Bamford
References:
Deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1?
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
Next by thread:
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?
Previous by date:
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1?
Next by date:
Re: Deprecate EAPIs 1 and 2?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.