Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Subject: Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:09:17 +0100
On 23:23 Wed 25 Mar     , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
> > > 10) dohard and dosed banned in EAPI 3
> > 
> > I think I missed the reasoning for removing these, particularly
> > dosed. pybugz didn't see any open bugs.
> 
> Portage doesn't merge hardlinks correctly, so dohard is bad. And
> dosed's been considered deprecated for years.

I like dosed because I've used it many times for the $D-removing 
feature. If there was (is?) an automatic filter at install-time that 
scanned files to remove $D references, that would work for me instead.

> > > 11) doinclude, newinclude for EAPI 3
> > 
> > Is installing to /usr/include by default useful for most packages
> > that want to use this? Or would they /usr/include/${PN}? If you have
> > to change it often, aren't you just as well off using insinto/doins?
> > Should there be an "includeinto"?
> 
> I'd be inclined to agree on that one, but people seem to be after more
> of these do* things.

I'm still not convinced this one adds anything significant beyond doins 
by default that it's worth adding. In half the cases 
(/usr/include/$PN/foo.h or anywhere else vs /usr/include/foo.h), you'd 
need to customize its install directory and so effectively are just 
running insinto/doins. Plus it's only useful for ebuilds that have a 
crappy install anyway, so wouldn't we rather fix the build system?

> > > 21) REPLACING_VERSIONS and REPLACED_BY_VERSION in EAPI 3
> > 
> > I'm curious why it isn't global. Seems like it would make sense to
> > put it near dependencies. Also I could be wrong, but wouldn't you
> > want to be able to cache this and show smart pretend output, etc?
> 
> I think you're misunderstanding what this is for. It's to allow
> packages to work out whether they're upgrading / downgrading /
> reinstalling / whatever, since Zac broke the devmanual-documented and
> PMS-required way of doing it using has_version and refuses to revert it.

Ah, I see. This is the first I'd heard about this anywhere (the problem 
or the proposal). So running has_version in setup/preinst and again in 
postinst doesn't do what you'd want anymore?

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Attachment:
pgp71ZZOQYrmS.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
Next by thread:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26
Previous by date:
Re: gSoC add Multiple Repository support to sys-apps/portage
Next by date:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.