1 |
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 17:39:27 James Cloos wrote: |
2 |
> Paweł Hajdan writes: |
3 |
> > Another thing we can consider is making UTF8 the default setup in |
4 |
> > Gentoo. I think most people (including me) don't care whether it's |
5 |
> > C or UTF8 as long as it works. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Forcing utf-8 will only be reasonable when there is a C.UTF-8 and/or |
8 |
> a POSIX.UTF-8 locale. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> In fact, glibc's insistance that C and POSIX are ascii rather than raw |
11 |
> unspecified eight bit is itself a bug. |
12 |
|
13 |
yeah, no. take it up with the POSIX group where they're already working on |
14 |
defining a C.UTF-8/etc... locale. |
15 |
|
16 |
> That should be done upstream in glibc, but were they to refuse then |
17 |
> Gentoo should add it to the glibc ebuild. |
18 |
|
19 |
this doesnt really make sense, upstream or down. if you wanted to talk about |
20 |
setting default LANG in the baselayout, then that's about the only reasonable |
21 |
possibility (especially since we already do this to a degree). screwing with |
22 |
default locale when no locale variables are set is madness. |
23 |
|
24 |
> The language_country locales are just wrong for root. They are often |
25 |
> broken (locales like en_US force case-insensitive colation, meaning that |
26 |
> a command such as 'rm [a-z]*' will unlink(2) 'Makefile' and similar files |
27 |
> which one would not expect to match) and cause bugs. |
28 |
|
29 |
this is pure opinion |
30 |
-mike |