| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I couldn't agree more! |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Perhaps cx86 for contributors' ebuilds? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That sounds like a good idea. contributor / community ebuilds. We can |
| 8 |
> wait and see if we can get some input from official devs on the situation |
| 9 |
> and then determine our course of action. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > My ebuilds (#13452 and #14205) were submitted in January. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> My last ones are already obsoleted by another stable release ;) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Ragnar Hojland - Project Manager |
| 17 |
> Linalco "Especialistas Linux y en Software Libre" |
| 18 |
> http://www.linalco.com Tel: +34-91-5970074 Fax: +34-91-5970083 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The problem is that in order to make intelligent commit decisions, you |
| 24 |
need to understand the ebuild and (likely) the program. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
There are some proposals being discussed internally to help deal with |
| 27 |
the ebuild update situation. Let's see where those take us before we try |
| 28 |
other approaches. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 32 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives