From: | "Joshua J. Berry" <condordes@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? | ||
Date: | Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:07:33 | ||
Message-Id: | 20040919200736.GA13163@deneb.condordes.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? by Dan Armak |
1 | On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:06:29PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > /usr/qt,kde was my decision at the time. I didn't see any obvious better |
4 | > FHS-mandated place to put them in. If there's a better place, I'd at least |
5 | > like to hear about it. |
6 | |
7 | Why /usr instead of /opt? |
8 | |
9 | Based on my recollection of the FHS, it seems like /opt would be the better |
10 | place to put it ... |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Joshua J. Berry |
14 | |
15 | "I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere." |
16 | -- /usr/games/fortune |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |