Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:06:54 +0300
Matt Turner писал 2012-05-23 19:59:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
>> 2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS)
>
> Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage
> on *really* slow systems.

Isnt cvs too sloow on mips? git is much more faster. Same for arm.
About big repos, well why not use shallow cloned repo. It will work 
with plane history
-- 
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, 
Gatchina, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev
mailto:alexxyum@...
mailto:alexxy@g.o
mailto:alexxy@...


Replies:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Matt Turner
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.