| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Dne 25.1.2011 13:13, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a): |
| 5 |
> On 1/25/11 12:20 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 6 |
>> I would like to upgrade tree-wide policy for EAPI usage in main tree. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I have a great idea for you. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something |
| 11 |
> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from |
| 12 |
> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted |
| 13 |
> more quickly than setting a policy. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make |
| 16 |
> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Paweł |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
Why would we need subproject for this. |
| 21 |
QA team itself is done to help developers with this tasks. So if someone |
| 22 |
come to #gentoo-qa and ask us to help him with his shiny eclass we won't |
| 23 |
sent him somewhere else where sun is not shining :P |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
And that apply even if developer itself is not maintainer and did not |
| 26 |
get reply from the maintainer... :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Tom |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wiIACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcXQwCgmnvpToj97h+P11ljcXjJiL3j |
| 34 |
55UAn3FPehseXf8OkwoJvqbSp9dECdsK |
| 35 |
=1zHu |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives