List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Many of these bugs have already been fixed.
Reading through bug 18918, Azarah's comments seem perfectly reasonable
to me, so I think the author of that message was a bit harsh.
Lindstrom's last comment on that bug does seem fairly clear, but I'm
wondering if his proposed fix will break /etc/profile for the zsh (and
any other fancy *sh that might exist that I don't know anything about)?
I do agree that we should try to prevent our /etc/profile from breaking
people's prompts, but I don't want people to lose the distinctive Gentoo
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 23:19, Spider wrote:
> This erroneously appeared in -user and was appropiately ignored ;-)
> Can somone with a bit more time than I have take a look?
> begin forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:14:05 +0200
> From: Björn Lindström <bkhl@...>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's trouble with /bin/sh
> Also vaguely related:
Grant Goodyear <email@example.com>
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)