Many of these bugs have already been fixed.  

Reading through bug 18918, Azarah's comments seem perfectly reasonable
to me, so I think the author of that message was a bit harsh. 
Lindstrom's last comment on that bug does seem fairly clear, but I'm
wondering if his proposed fix will break /etc/profile for the zsh (and
any other fancy *sh that might exist that I don't know anything about)? 
I do agree that we should try to prevent our /etc/profile from breaking
people's prompts, but I don't want people to lose the distinctive Gentoo
eye-candy, either.

Anybody thoughts? 

-g2boojum-

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 23:19, Spider wrote:
> This erroneously appeared in -user and was appropiately ignored ;-)
> 
> Can somone with a bit more time than I have take a look?

> begin  forwarded message:
> 
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:14:05 +0200
> From: Björn Lindström <bkhl@...>
> To: gentoo-user@g.o
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's trouble with /bin/sh

> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18914
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18915
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19782
> 
> Also vaguely related:
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18922
> 

-- 
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>