Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, council <council@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:39:17
Message-Id: 4D3EB61B.4060908@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi,
5 Given the talk on last council meeting I would like this policy to be in
6 effect over main tree:
7
8 Every arch teams should stabilise OR write out reason why they can't do
9 so to stable bug in 90 days. If any arch team fails to do so the
10 maintainer can decide to drop their keywords to testing. Given depgraph
11 breakages the maintainer can coordinate with the QA team to drop all
12 reverse dependencies to testing too.
13 Only exception from this rule are toolchain and base-system bugs, since
14 testing-only effectively means that the arch lost stable status as whole.
15 In order to accommodate this goals Arch Teams can generate Arch Testers
16 which can comment on the bugs in their name, where maintainer then can
17 act upon their comments (eg: if ARM at say that everything is ok,
18 maintainer can stabilise it on arm...). (Come on for most stable testing
19 you don't really need to be fully fledged Gentoo dev, but you just need
20 the named hardware and working brain :))
21
22 Cheers
23
24 Tom
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
27 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
28
29 iEYEARECAAYFAk0+thsACgkQHB6c3gNBRYfW4wCfXbctXUgKoK53Pd45QuAMgY7r
30 Sy4AoMU6z/oS/JvUum6/29SHYsmuoQBs
31 =LQj9
32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches "Paweł Hajdan
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Slacker arches Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Status of sparc-fbsd, amd64-fbsd Torsten Veller <tove@g.o>