-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe Peterson wrote:
> I'm not sure the "EBUILD_" in "EBUILD_FLAGS" would be necessary
> (redundant?).  Maybe even "OPTIONS" or "PROPERTIES" makes more sense.
> In fact, "FLAGS" might be a little too generic, even?  Worth a short
> discussion.

I think something like "PROPERTIES" or "ATTRIBUTES" would be nice.

Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiWNvgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaML/QCgj7Aof1UEVGrtBNcloDjFMhDJ
izEAn2FTGTnnDa23XEF3ZENc9UaQU0P4
=JrMC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----