1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Joe Peterson wrote: |
5 |
> I'm not sure the "EBUILD_" in "EBUILD_FLAGS" would be necessary |
6 |
> (redundant?). Maybe even "OPTIONS" or "PROPERTIES" makes more sense. |
7 |
> In fact, "FLAGS" might be a little too generic, even? Worth a short |
8 |
> discussion. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think something like "PROPERTIES" or "ATTRIBUTES" would be nice. |
11 |
|
12 |
Zac |
13 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
14 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
15 |
|
16 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkiWNvgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaML/QCgj7Aof1UEVGrtBNcloDjFMhDJ |
17 |
izEAn2FTGTnnDa23XEF3ZENc9UaQU0P4 |
18 |
=JrMC |
19 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |