Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:53:27
Message-Id: 489636F9.2090307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds? by Joe Peterson
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Joe Peterson wrote:
5 > I'm not sure the "EBUILD_" in "EBUILD_FLAGS" would be necessary
6 > (redundant?). Maybe even "OPTIONS" or "PROPERTIES" makes more sense.
7 > In fact, "FLAGS" might be a little too generic, even? Worth a short
8 > discussion.
9
10 I think something like "PROPERTIES" or "ATTRIBUTES" would be nice.
11
12 Zac
13 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
15
16 iEYEARECAAYFAkiWNvgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaML/QCgj7Aof1UEVGrtBNcloDjFMhDJ
17 izEAn2FTGTnnDa23XEF3ZENc9UaQU0P4
18 =JrMC
19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----