1 |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:12, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 01:48:16 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
>>> > On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 00:04:57 Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
>>> >> Honestly, I think a better solution would be to provide a convenience |
7 |
>>> >> function library, independent of OpenRC. Sourcing random internal |
8 |
>>> >> scripts of a random package is just broken by concept. |
9 |
>>> > |
10 |
>>> > except it hasnt been random and has clearly been defined by having |
11 |
>>> > existed since the beginning of Gentoo |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> /etc/init.d/functions.sh has existed for the last decade, and was long ago |
16 |
>> decided as the canonical public entry point for scripts external to baselayout |
17 |
>> (as opposed to a path in /sbin/). it isnt going anywhere, and painting it as |
18 |
>> something in flux at this point is disingenuous. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So... Gentoo's base system can never change, and hence new init |
21 |
> systems are not welcome. Okay. Got it. |
22 |
|
23 |
you really should refrain from inserting words into other people's |
24 |
mouths. at no point did i ever make this statement. |
25 |
-mike |