From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' | ||
Date: | Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:35:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090822013459.1ace9a4b@snowmobile | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' by Chip Parker |
1 | On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:29:12 -0700 |
2 | Chip Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > If this feature, which HAD been documented (in bugzilla and |
4 | > commitlogs) prior to the first RFC for PMS |
5 | |
6 | As I've already explained to you on bugzilla, this is untrue. You're |
7 | confusing user configuration with the tree. PMS has nothing to say |
8 | about user configuration, and nothing is being done to take away the |
9 | feature you're concerned about. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' | Chip Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com> |