1 |
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote: |
2 |
> On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs |
4 |
> > pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a |
7 |
> > lighter alternative for embedded/alternative systems. as such, i'd like |
8 |
> > to introduce a virtual/pkgconfig that allows for selection of simpler |
9 |
> > (but compatible) implementations. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > we've got an implementation in perl (i'm not interested in), but there is |
12 |
> > also "pkg-config-lite" and "pkgconf". they should be compatible with |
13 |
> > the canonical pkg-config. they aren't yet in the tree, but will be once |
14 |
> > we agree on this topic. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > any comments ? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'd just like to say, i'm also an Atheme project member and I have |
19 |
> authorisation from nenolod (the primary pkgconf developer) to make |
20 |
> changes and stuff, so I can upstream any changes necessary to make |
21 |
> pkgconf work for us. |
22 |
|
23 |
that sounds really good. i sent you some patches ;). |
24 |
|
25 |
however, it's missing pkg.m4. any thoughts on that ? |
26 |
-mike |