Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:39:00 +0200
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
> 
>> On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> all,
>>>
>>> I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time
>>> to toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The issue is that we need glibc
>>> 2.5 or higher and not mips. So one solution is to put the following:
>>>
>>> default/linux: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu"
>>> default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
>>>
>>> However, this means we'll have to put a has_version check in  
>>> profile.bashrc of default/linux, which seems a bit cludgy..
>>>
>>> Any suggestions? Comments?
> 
> Also >sys-devel/binutils-2.17.
> 
>> I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I
>> installed Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose
>> conservative with CFLAGS?  make.conf.example also does not much more
>> than "-march -O2 -pipe".  -O1 to the linker feels conservative to
>> me.  Still, do we really need to go any further?  Why not make
>> additional pointers to possible values for LDFLAGS like we do for
>> C(XX)FLAGS in the installation manual?
> 
> +1.
> 
> The default is already to generate a GNU style hash when available.
> I really don't know why we need to screw with it further.
> 
> 

It's actually not. In Gentoo we patch this to use 'both' as the default.


-- 
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list