Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time to lastrite compiz AND blender due to lack of maintainer & broken
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:46:13
Message-Id: CAL0O3aN8RKVo=oSYx+eSFZ=zYYWFM_5TaxryqVh2N0=nofJVCA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time to lastrite compiz AND blender due to lack of maintainer & broken by Samuli Suominen
1 On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
2 > I don't think that will cut it... It's not the only unhandled compiz bug
3 > in tree[1]. Not sure why it should be given any special status, if it's
4 > not maintained and broken, it should just be punted.
5 >
6 > Also blender should go, since we have had nothing usable in tree for a
7 > while[2].
8 >
9 > [1] http://tinyurl.com/css37zx
10 > [2] http://tinyurl.com/ckur2jz
11
12 IMHO, punting a high-profile, widely-used package like blender is an
13 option of last resort. It's not something we can do if gentoo wants to
14 continue calling itself a major distro. As for "nothing usable in
15 tree", most of the bugs are about optional USE-flag controlled
16 features and/or the ancient 2.4x releases. Blender-2.57 with
17 USE=-ffmpeg builds and runs fine.
18
19 A real issue is that gentoo ships patches to improve blender security
20 defaults that upstream apparently does not care much about (see
21 http://lwn.net/Articles/452273/), and therefore these patches have to
22 be updated on every version bump, which increases maintenance burden
23 and delays getting new versions in portage - new versions that may
24 well contain fixes for the bugs in Samuli's list. Given the lack of
25 manpower for maintaining blender, perhaps replacing the patches with a
26 big ewarn in pkg_postinst might be a less bad longterm solution.
27
28 In any case, comment 14 of bug #382097 seems to indicate that at least
29 one person will be willing to maintain blender starting in January
30 2012.
31
32 -Alexandre.