1 |
Wyatt Epp posted on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:57:47 -0400 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh |
4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:55:18 +1200 Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
6 |
>> wrote: |
7 |
>>> I'd love a tag solution, that'd be nice, is there a GLEP for it yet? |
8 |
|
9 |
>> The slow parts are coming up with a good design, getting the Council to |
10 |
>> approve it, and getting Portage to implement it. The fast part is |
11 |
>> getting the PMS bit done. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> The problem with tags is that all we've heard so far is "we should have |
14 |
>> tags!", with no description of what tags are, what they'll solve or how |
15 |
>> they're used. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Tags are basically keywords you can use to describe packages, allowing |
18 |
> you to easily search and explore your options based on what the packages |
19 |
> actually does (if we want to get technical, anything that identifies a |
20 |
> package is a sort of tag: name, version, license, set, checksum, etc.). |
21 |
|
22 |
Umm... I believe Ciaran meant "no description" in the practical PM |
23 |
implementation rules sense, not in the general definition sense, which I |
24 |
suppose most folks here understand by now. |
25 |
|
26 |
Ciaran is, after all, a (arguably the) prime mover behind PMS, defining |
27 |
the standards to which Gentoo package managers must conform. So his |
28 |
concern is very likely to be in that regard -- actually seeing a draft |
29 |
GLEP defining the technical rules in enough detail that the three PMs can |
30 |
implement it to the point that if they disagree on how a tag should be |
31 |
implemented and treated, it's clear which one's bugged and which ones |
32 |
following the standard, so the bugged one can be fixed. |
33 |
|
34 |
Until that happens, or at least is actually in process, it's all talk. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
38 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
39 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |