| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 07:59 -0600, Nick Devito wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yeah, to me, having those in the emulation category just |
| 3 |
> doesn't...."fit" there, but, that's just me. Maybe we could take xen, |
| 4 |
> vmware, qemu, and related packages out of app-emulation, and make a new |
| 5 |
> category, app-virtualization. That would seem to fit a bit better then |
| 6 |
> emulation. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Everything looks perfectly fine the way it is right now. |
| 9 |
Changing stuff for the sake of changing stuff does nothing but |
| 10 |
cause other people problems. Forcing a package moves which |
| 11 |
incramentally makes doing package updates take longer and longer |
| 12 |
over time. It also forces people to run fixpackages more than |
| 13 |
they really should ever have to. Sometimes even causing a full |
| 14 |
remerge of the package. Please just be happy that the packages all |
| 15 |
exist and are being well maintained after. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives