Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:17:46
Message-Id: 4EC16928.1050809@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default by Hilco Wijbenga
1 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
2 > On 14 November 2011 10:34, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> Zac Medico wrote:
4 >>> On 11/14/2011 09:38 AM, Dale wrote:
5 >>>> As I type:
6 >>>>
7 >>>> emerge should show build output by default (unless --quiet-build=y) 42%
8 >>>>
9 >>>> So far that's the winner. As I posted earlier, people expect things to
10 >>>> work like they have always worked. I say that as a user.
11 >>> As I've explained in my post to that forum thread [1], you have to
12 >>> factor in the "silent majority" that welcomes the change and does not
13 >>> express it publicly. A forumor mailing list thread tends to attract a
14 >>> "vocal minority", which tends to bias the discussion (or voting results)
15 >>> in way that does not give a fair statistical representation of the
16 >>> gentoo population as a whole (it excludes the "silent majority"). It's
17 >>> part of human nature that those who are displeased with the changed more
18 >>> likely to speak up than those who welcome the change.
19 >>>
20 >>> [1]
21 >>>
22 >>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6871718.html?sid=960ebd269384029c21e708d8dfa745ef#6871718
23 >> The same could be said if the poll was going the other way as well. If the
24 >> results are not going to be used or just going to be explained away, then
25 >> why have the poll to begin with? I don't think you started the poll but
26 >> just saying. . .
27 >>
28 >> Again, as a loooooong time user, I expect things to remain like they are
29 >> unless that is going to break something or is a must change with no other
30 >> option. That does happen from time to time but this is not one of those
31 >> times. I shouldn't have to go override settings just to keep it like it
32 >> was.
33 > Shouldn't you still be on MS-DOS then? ;-) Insisting that basically
34 > nothing should ever change seems rather extreme... And not very
35 > realistic?
36 >
37
38 Allow me to quote myself:
39
40 " is a must change with no other option."
41
42 I wasn't talking about computers in general but about portage. So let
43 me rephrase this a bit. I expect PORTAGE to work like it has unless a
44 change is forced because of a lack of other options. I was trying to
45 keep it on topic. I could use the analogy that Ford might decide to
46 make it so that when you turn the steering wheel to the right the car
47 goes left. Thing is, that doesn't quite stay on topic and may not even
48 be a good comparison. Thing is, it is not what people are used to or
49 expect. If you think about it, they could just say that the bottom of
50 the steering wheel tells which way you will be going not the top. This
51 would be the case even if the steering wheel is on the opposite side of
52 the car too. ^_^
53
54 Also, I don't use anything M$. I have NEVER bought anything that M$
55 makes. Period. As long as Linux exists, I have not only a good option
56 but a GREAT option. Read that as I hate winders.
57
58 Dale
59
60 :-) :-)
61
62 --
63 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!