Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Any outstanding dodgy finds?
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:28:40
Message-Id: 20050804232148.3c66bec7@snowdrop.home
1 Is anyone aware of any outstanding problems with the stricter find
2 argument ordering required by findutils 4.2.20? xorg is no longer
3 holding up 4.2.20 going stable -- are there any others?
4
5 For those not aware of the problem, find must only be used in the
6 following form:
7
8 find paths program-options search-options actions
9
10 Older findutils versions would silently accept most orderings. Newer
11 versions will either barf or make lots of noise.
12
13 (Sidenote: the paths part is mandatory. Current findutils will default
14 to the current directory if no path is provided, but other
15 implementations and future findutils versions may exit with an error.)
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
19 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
20 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Any outstanding dodgy finds? Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>