1 |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:00:51AM +0200, Rainer Groesslinger wrote: |
2 |
> stable.gentoo.org is _great_ ! Thanks so much to blizzy |
3 |
> (unfortunatly he's not in the dev team any more). The problem here |
4 |
> is that this site must be pushed quite hard because there are |
5 |
> packages in the tree only a few people use and if those people don't |
6 |
> use stable.gentoo.org they won't be stable anytime soon or might - |
7 |
> in a bad case - be pushed into stable because nobody complain |
8 |
> although it's just because nobody uses stable.gentoo.org |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm running a mix of 'stable' and 'unstable' packages. I try to report |
11 |
if they work as much as possible to the stable.gentoo.org, but it's |
12 |
hard to keep track of what I'm running as stable, and what I'm running |
13 |
as unstable... The problem is, that when I've just installed an |
14 |
unstable package, I can't say much about the 'stableness' of it, I can |
15 |
just say if it emerges or not. And if it didn't emerge properly, I |
16 |
would use bugs.gentoo.org, not stable.gentoo.org. And after running my |
17 |
unstable package for a week, I can witness of the stability of the |
18 |
package, but by then, I have forgotten all about reporting it... |
19 |
|
20 |
Thus, I propose an extension to emerge that would look through your |
21 |
system and see which packages are marked as 'unstable' and ask the |
22 |
user interactively if they think the packages are OK. The responses |
23 |
could be of the type: |
24 |
1) Yes, I've used it extensively and it works. |
25 |
2) Yes, I've used it somewhat and it seems to work. |
26 |
3) No idea, I don't think I've used it, but nothing is broke. |
27 |
4) No idea, I haven't used it at all yet. |
28 |
5) No, it doesn't work and I've used bugzilla to report the bug. |
29 |
|
30 |
You hopefully get the idea... |
31 |
|
32 |
Combine it with some kind of cgi-gateway on stable.gentoo.org, |
33 |
similar to the one at the stats.gentoo.org and it would be quite |
34 |
simple for users to start tracking their unstable packages so they |
35 |
could be adopted for stable. |
36 |
|
37 |
I know, talk isn't worth anything and code is everything. ;) |
38 |
|
39 |
//H |
40 |
-- |
41 |
To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |