Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:06:45 +0000 (UTC)
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 30 May 2012 07:32:49 -0400 as excerpted:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the
>> conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>>
>>
> A mock conversion would probably help with creating procedures/docs/etc
> as well.  It is nice to say that we're "just going to use git" but I
> think everybody has a slightly different picture of how that is going to
> work.

I /believe/ such mock conversions had been done, based on previous 
threads here, tho NOT on the SCM-migration list, which would certainly 
have the greater detail.  AFAIK the previous sticking points were all 
those still-open bugs, not the general conversion.  But the bugs, other 
than documentation, either seem mostly fixed or not so important, any 
more.

Of course, those previous trial runs are probably similarly dated, now, 
so a new one's probably in order with the new perspective on those bug 
priorities, etc, but at least getting the input of someone that was 
involved with them should speed progress over some already covered 
ground, in any case.

(I've considered following scmm myself, but there's apparently some sort 
of issue between gmane, pan, and lists commonly crossposted between, that 
has already killed project for me, header-fetch does nothing, and scmm 
would almost certainly be similarly dead to me.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman



Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.