| 1 |
Graham Murray wrote: |
| 2 |
> Rémi Cardona <remi@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Ditto, 2.6.32 will have new features for X users and I'd like to have |
| 5 |
>> it keyworded and stabilized at the same time as gentoo-sources. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Is that doable? Are there any specific reasons why both aren't bumped |
| 8 |
>> at the same time? Man power issues? Lack of cookies/beer/ponies? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Not just stabilising at the same time, it would also be nice if |
| 11 |
> linux-headers was put into ~arch at the same time as the corresponding |
| 12 |
> gentoo-sources. Even though the of stabilising 2.6.31 has been proposed, |
| 13 |
> linux-headers-2.6.31 is still not in the tree. Ideally, I think it would |
| 14 |
> be nice if the corresponding linux-headers were put into tree, but |
| 15 |
> packaged masked, when the -rc vanilla-sources are put into ~arch, but |
| 16 |
> that is probably asking too much. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There's no real need for linux-headers and running kernel to be same |
| 20 |
version, but yes, it would be nice. |
Archives