Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:05:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | BANLkTi=XuOMWt9rNyd0UOasN4bxKVjM7mw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems? by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:58, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | > Why can't we just split up functions.sh into "/lib/output.sh" |
| 3 | |
| 4 | we're not changing the file name |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > containing the init script independent (but often gentoo specific) |
| 7 | > output stuff, and have functions.sh source this. Output.sh would be |
| 8 | > provided by a separate package (why not baselayout) and the packages |
| 9 | > using those would rewrite their stuff to use the right location. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | we're not splitting the source trees. the reasons have already been |
| 12 | detailed in the bug open on the topic. |
| 13 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |